Phonology and the Lexicon
Your teacher
:James Myers (
Goals:
In this class we'll be looking at recent attempts, both within generative theory and outside of it, to deal with the role of the lexicon in phonology. Why? Because it's important for understanding the human mind, and also because I think it's cool, so you get to see an actual professional linguist doing his actual research. But what do you get out of it? Well, you'll learn how to think, read, and write. And who knows -- maybe you'll make a new discovery that you can publish or present at a conference.< /P>
Grading:
10% Class participation
40% Leading discussion
50% Term paper (due 1.5)
This class is a discussion class. All we will do is read papers (real ones, not from a textbook) and discuss them together. So class participation means you discuss: you read, think, talk, and respond to others' ideas (nicely, but not too nice).
Every week somebody will lead the discussion on the week's paper. The discussion leader should NOT summarize the whole paper. Instead, she or he should act as a teacher, first giving us a general overview of the main points of the paper, and then askin g us questions that can inspire us to discuss together. You are encouraged to ask questions that even you don't know how to answer, but keep your discussion organized. That means you should bring the focus back to the big issues if we get lost. If you eve r want to be a teacher, here's a chance for you to practice.
The other important part of the class is to prepare a term paper with an original phonological analysis of something. The only restriction is that it has to connect with the theoretical issues discussed in this class. You should choose a topic by 11.14 so you have time to do a good job on it. The paper itself should be short (about 15 pages maximum, in English), with formatting like the real published papers we read. On the last day of class, you'll give a short, informal and ungraded presentation on y our research, just so you can get some feedback to help you revise. The paper is due about a week later (Monday, 1.5), in my mailbox by 5 pm.
Schedule (may be changed later)
Week |
Topic/Activity |
Readings |
9.18 |
Who cares about phonology and the lexicon? |
|
9.25 |
Review of phonological theory |
|
10.2 |
Phonology and memory |
Myers, et al. (2003) |
10.9 |
The classical generative view |
SPE pp. 28-55 |
10.16 |
No class (James away at a meeting) |
|
10.23 |
Phonology and morphology |
Mohanan (1995) |
10.30 |
The theory of Lexical Phonology |
Xu (2001) |
11.6 |
Lexical Phonology vs. Optimality Theory |
Booij (1997) |
11.13 |
Morphology and variation in Optimality Theory |
Anttila (2002) |
11.14* |
Discuss paper topics (*Friday, 14:10-17:00) |
|
11.20 |
Modeling phonetics in lexical representations |
Pierrehumbert (2002) |
11.27 |
Frequency effects |
Bybee (2003) |
12.4 |
Analogical modeling of phonology |
Eddington (2000) |
12.11 |
Analogy using Optimality Theory |
Myers (2002) |
12.18 |
Hands-on practice with computational phonology |
|
12.25 |
Presentations (last class) |
|
1.1 |
No class (New Year's Day) |
|
1.5 |
TERM PAPER DUE (5 pm in my mailbox) |
|
Class readings
Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.1-42.
Booij, Geert. 1997. Non-derivational phonology meets lexical phonology. Derivations and constraints in phonology, ed. by Iggy Roca, 261-288. Oxfored, UK: Clarendon Press.
Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14.261-290.
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. Reprinted 1991 by Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [SPE]
Eddington, David. 2000. Spanish stress assignment within the Analogical Modeling of Language. Language 76.92-109.
Mohanan, K. P. 1995. The organization of the grammar. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by John A. Goldsmith, 24-69. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Myers, James. 2002. Exemplar-driven analogy in Optimality Theory. Analogical Modeling: an exemplar-based approach to language, ed. by Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale and Dilworth B. Parkinson, 265-300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Myers, James, Hsin-hsien Lee, and Jane Tsay. 2003. Phonological production in Taiwan Sign Language. National Chung Cheng University ms. In submission.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory phonology 7, ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner, 101-139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Xu, De Bao. 2001. Lexical third tone sandhi and the lexical organization of Mandarin. Chinese phonology in generative grammar, ed. by De Bao Xu, 45-94. San Diego: Academic Press.
Other sources on phonology
何大安(民
75)聲韻學中的觀念和方法。大安出版社。Archangeli, Diana and D. Terence Langendoen. 1997. Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Carr, Philip. 1993. Phonology. MacMillan.
Hargus, S. and Kaisse, E. M. 1993. Phonetics and phonology: Studies in Lexical Phonology. Academic Press.
Kager, Rene. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Katamba, Francis. 1989. An introduction to phonology. Longman.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Blackwell.
Roca, Iggy and Wyn Johnson. 1999. A course in phonology. Blackwell.
The Rutgers Optimality Archive: http://roa.rutgers.edu/