Phonology II
Spring 2005 ... Tuesday 10:15-13:00 ...文學院 413
Me
:Goals:
Not only is Optimality Theory the lingua franca of current theoretical phonology, but it also has some dramatic strengths and weaknesses in comparison with previous approaches. In this class we will explore these by reading and discussing recent papers on OT, including those you choose and write yourself.
Grading:
What the class is like:
This class is a discussion class. All we will do is read papers (real ones, not from a textbook) and discuss them together. So class participation means you discuss: you read, think, talk, and respond to others' ideas.
Every week somebody will lead the discussion on the week's paper, using a handout with questions to inspire us to discuss together. The questions should be organized in a logical way to make sure we address the most important issues in the paper, situating them in the larger phonological literature, but your questions should also allow us to clarify smaller points in the paper that may be confusing. You are encouraged to ask questions that even you don't know how to answer, but you are the one responsible to bring the focus back to the big issues if we get lost. You do NOT have to talk more than everybody else.
By the middle of the semester, you should choose a topic of your own to write about. The only restriction is that it has to connect with the theoretical issues discussed in this class and be empirically testable. After you choose your topic, the discussions will then turn to focus on papers that YOU choose to help you with YOUR project.
On the last day of class (06.14), you'll give a conference-style presentation about your research. The paper is due a bit more than a week later (Friday, 06.24) in my mailbox by 5 pm. The paper should be about 20 pages, in English, with formatting like the real published papers we read. I'll grade it in the usual way (style, logic, theory).
Schedule (there are likely to be changes along the way)
* marks when due dates for things relating to your paper
(links to related resources will be added for each reading)
Note changes in schedule!
Week |
Topic/Activity |
Readings |
02.22 |
Welcome! |
|
03.01 |
Faith vs. markedness |
|
03.08 |
OT, variability, and acquisition |
|
03.15 |
OT and phonetics |
|
03.22 |
Beyond OT and variability |
|
03.29 |
Why OT is all wrong |
|
04.05 |
NO CLASS: "spring break" |
|
04.12 |
OT and opacity |
|
04.19 |
Does OT need derivations? |
|
04.26 |
Is OT a theory of everything? |
|
*05.03 |
Discuss paper topics |
|
05.10 |
Your choice |
Your choice |
05.17 |
Your choice |
Your choice |
05.24 |
Your choice |
Your choice |
05.31 |
Your choice |
Your choice |
06.07 |
Your choice |
Your choice |
*06.14 |
Presentations (last class) |
|
*06.24 |
TERM PAPERS DUE BY 5 PM IN MY BOX |
Readings
Boersma, Paul, and Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32:45-86.
Burzio, Luigi. 2001. Zero derivations. Linguistic Inquiry 32:658-677.
Duanmu, San. 2004. A corpus study of Chinese regulated verse: phrasal stress and the analysis of variability. Phonology 21:43-89.
Gordon, Matthew. 2004. Positional weight constraints in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 35:692-703.
Hale, Mark, and Charles Reiss. 2000. Phonology as cognition. In Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr, & G. Docherty, 161-184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, John. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16:331-399.
McMahon, April. 2003. Phonology and the Holy Grail. Lingua 113 (2):103-115.
Rubach, Jerzy. 2004. Derivation in Optimality Theory: A reply to Burzio. Linguistic Inquiry 35:656-670.
Yip, Moira. 2003. Reactions to April McMahon's paper. Lingua 113 (2):117-121.
Zhang, Jie. 2004. The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner, and Donca Steriade (eds.) Phonetically-based phonology, pp. 157-190. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.